PCPlay Coin Desk Open the partner account
Affiliate disclosure. The partner link in the masthead and beside the copy on this page is a sponsored link to a partner operator, and this site may be paid if you open an account through it, at no extra cost to you. It carries rel="sponsored noopener" and opens in a new tab. That matters more than usual on this desk: the subject here is an arrangement in which a currency is sold and cannot be sold back, and this site's own funding works through a link in exactly that category. There is no ranking, no review and no recommendation of any product, currency or offer anywhere on this site.
Play Coin Desk / Seven beliefs
Checked, not asserted

Seven beliefs, checked

Each of these is a sentence a player can reasonably arrive with, and each one changes a decision that costs money. None of the seven is answered by opinion here; each is answered by the mechanism the rest of this desk describes.

Bought: priced, spendable, not redeemableGranted: unpriced, the only route outNo route: no sale price exists
Direct answerThe seven most common beliefs about play-money products are wrong in one direction: they assume the balance behaves like money. It does not. A coin has a purchase price and no sale price, only a granted currency can ever be redeemed, free entry is a classification argument rather than a description, the discount between bundles is a discount on currency and not on value, a balance is a licence that can expire or be forfeited, and buying coins is a purchase of virtual goods rather than a deposit.

A coin is worth something, because it has a price

False

A price is what you pay. Value is what somebody else will pay, and the terms prohibit anybody else paying anything: the currency has no monetary value, transfer is prohibited, and no sale price exists. One published price out of three is not a market - it is a valve that only opens one way. The arithmetic.

You can win real money on a play-money casino

Partly true

Only through the granted currency, only where the product offers a redemption route, and only when eligibility, minimum and verification are satisfied. A balance in the bought currency wins you more bought currency, which has no route out at all. The redemption page.

It is not gambling because it is free

Partly true

The games are chance games with prizes, and the absence of consideration is an argument about classification rather than a description of the experience. It can be true of the arrangement and false of the evening. The classification page.

If it is not gambling, a regulator is watching it

False

That is the point of the classification for the operator: no licensing, no customer-money rules, no statutory safer-play duties and no independent complaint body. Contract and consumer law still apply, from behind rather than in front. The consequences.

The big bundle is better value

Partly true

Coins per pound do rise - by 60% from the smallest illustrative bundle to the largest, a 37.5% fall in the cost of a single coin - and that is a real discount on currency. It does not raise the share of the bundle with any route out, which is zero in all four bundles on this desk's ladder, and it does not raise the granted share, which stays at 20%. The two balances.

Coins I have not spent are mine to keep

False

The definition clause licenses them to the account rather than giving you property, and the same document sets an expiry clock, a forfeiture trigger and a closure clause. A balance you cannot spend in time is a balance you are holding for the operator. The clause list.

Buying coins is a deposit

False

A deposit is a movement of your money that stays yours. This is a purchase of a virtual good that is spent when it is spent, and the remedies that follow are consumer remedies for a purchase rather than the protections attached to a gambling account. The crossover.

Worked example - two of these beliefs, priced (illustrative) Belief 1, tested: a player buys the largest bundle at 1,600 coins per GBP 1, spends GBP 10.00, and holds 16,000 coins. Value on exit: 16,000 × GBP 0.00 per coin = GBP 0.00. The belief that the balance is worth GBP 10.00 is wrong by the full GBP 10.00.
Belief 5, tested: the same player buys four small bundles instead of one large one. Four × GBP 10.00 = GBP 40.00 spent; coins received = 4 × 10,000 = 40,000 coins, against 64,000 coins for GBP 40.00 at the large bundle's rate (40 × 1,600). The belief that the large bundle is better value is correct, and worth 24,000 coins on this purchase - which is exactly why the belief survives. It is a true statement about the currency and a silent statement about value: all 64,000 coins still have an exit value of GBP 0.00.
Two beliefs, one wrong and one right, and the second is the more expensive one because it is the one a player acts on.

How the rest of the desk answers them

The two balances

Which balance is priced, which one can leave, and why the product needs both.

The closed economy

What the coins buy, and why nothing in the arrangement converts back.

Where a route out exists

The grant, the minimum, the verification and the voids.

The clause list

Six clauses, in the order that decides what your balance is.

What would change a verdict. Four of these verdicts turn on a single clause in a specific product's terms, and a product that drafts them differently would move the verdict honestly. A product that sold the redeemable currency directly would put consideration back into the arrangement and change the classification answer. A product that gave the bought currency a buy-back would create a second price and change the value answer. The verdicts here are about the architecture this desk describes, and they are written so that a reader can see exactly which clause would have to change to overturn them.